8 Comments
User's avatar
David Roberts's avatar

Sachi,

I'd ask for a risk assessment of pension assets in the case of either a 2000 or 2007 bubble bursting. How vulnerable are the assets? And what happens if the returns are say 0% or negative in a year. How does that affect the budget.

$2 bn is woefully inadequate as a rainy day fund. That's less than 2% of expenditures. What are the benchmarks for other large cities and for states?

Expand full comment
Sachi Takahashi-Rial's avatar

Ooh such good questions! These are going to my to-do list for follow-up. Thanks David!

Expand full comment
Mark Levine's avatar

You raise some excellent questions Sachi!

Expand full comment
Sachi Takahashi-Rial's avatar

Pensions are a big complicated topic, so it was a decent learning curve for me to even scratch the surface here. I'm looking forward to learning more and supporting the team!

Expand full comment
Erica DePiero's avatar

hot take: public pensions need to be updated. they were designed for a different era, when people stayed in one job / career for decades and then had (hopefully) 15 yrs of retirement. maybe we need to pay people a lot more while they are working instead of tying everything to a giant long-term payment plan?

Expand full comment
Sachi Takahashi-Rial's avatar

I love a hot take!!🔥I agree, the current system doesn't allow a ton of flexibility for city workers. And yet I'm jealous because a pension sounds pretty sweet. I wonder if there's a way to provide employees choice: opt into the pension or get more pay and a 401k.

Expand full comment
Faraz's avatar

Simple solution: stop the city from dipping into pension returns. It's absurd the city has any right to the accumulated wealth of its workers.

Expand full comment
Sachi Takahashi-Rial's avatar

Thanks Faraz! Not sure there's any simple solutions, since changing process can be very tough. But that's what I'm keeping in mind too.

Expand full comment